The Foundation for Glendora Unified Schools was one of five local nonprofits to receive a check from Wells Fargo Bank in celebration of their new location in Glendora. Board members Mike Beckman, Gene Murabito and Jeanne Beckman were in attendance at the grand opening of the new branch to accept the check which will be used to enhance education for students of the Glendora Unified School District.
Thank You to Our Business Donors
The Foundation for Glendora Unified Schools would like to thank the following businesses for their support of our recent fundraising event, Food for Thought.
This event, which supports the students of the Glendora Unified School District,
was a success due in large part to the generosity of our community businesses.
Please thank them through your patronage, and let them know you appreciate their support of your children’s education!
95.5 KLOS
A1 Rents
Armstrong Nursery
Bone Yard FX
Classic Coffee
Clubhouse 66
Divine Nails Spa
Fairplex
Fiorina
f’REAL! Foods
Frisella’s Roastery
Hill Top Real Estate
The Irish Gardener
Janell Thurston & Tracie Fiore, Mane Street Salon
Jan’s Towing
Judith Ripka Jewelry
Kumon Math & Reading Center
Laissez-Moi Designs
Luca Bella Fine Foods
Mylien’s Vietnamese Cafe
NVme Fashions
Outdoor Elegance
The Parlour Wine Bar and Bistro
Petrillo’s
Plaza Produce
Raging Waters
Rainbow Gardens Nursery
Referral Only Limousine
Sena Zimmer Photography
Sylvan Learning Center
SWIRE
Taco Grill
Traci Morrow Fitness
Universal Studios
Village Eatery
Village Goldsmith
GUSD Superintendent Winter ‘10 Letter
|
||
|
February 2010 |
BOARD OF EDUCATION Denice K. Delgado, President Douglas R. Ferrell, P.E, Vice President Doris Blum, Clerk Charles J. Gomer, Ph.D., Member Mike Gautreau, Member Catherine J. Nichols, Ed.D. Superintendent |
|
|
Dear Parents and Guardians: The Governor released his proposals for the 2010-11 State Budget in January. California continues to grapple with deficits that have been identified at approximately $20 billion. This is a huge deficit that the Governor is attempting to mitigate. In his “State of the State” presentation, the Governor stated that he protected funding to education. In reality, significant ongoing cuts to public education in the amount of approximately $225 per average daily attendance (ADA) have been proposed. The cost of living adjustment (COLA) has not been provided to the school district for several years. This is a staggering hit to our budget in GUSD. Challenges faced by GUSD prior to the Governor’s proposals: Prior to the Governor’s proposals in January, GUSD needed to make $2.5 million in cuts for
The ultimate effect: In the fall, GUSD needed to make approximately $2.5 million in cuts for 2010-11. Due to the Governor’s proposals in January, GUSD must make additional reductions to the projected budget by more than $1.5 million. The net effect is GUSD must now make significantly more cuts totaling approximately $4 million for 2010-11 that will stay in effect through 2011-12. Much of the revenue generated through the District of Choice Program has been used to maintain lower class sizes, to offset the loss of revenue associated with the reduction to the COLA and to mitigate the decline in enrollment. What does this mean to our students?
The Governor’s budget proposal is the starting point for negotiations at the state level and we anticipate that changes to his January proposal will be made prior to the final budget being adopted. However, as always, public education must make adjustments at the local level based upon the Governor’s budget proposals. These cuts are the greatest challenges GUSD has ever faced. We have worked together to maintain the integrity of the District during these devastating times for education. GUSD is not alone; school districts throughout the state are attempting to grapple with the same issues. School districts in the state are reducing the school year and taking salary reductions to protect employees and programs. These are very difficult times but let us work to keep the focus on the students while we, as adults, grapple with possible solutions that will keep our school district intact over the next few years until funding is restored. Parents are encouraged to give generously to the Foundation for Glendora Unified Schools (www.fgus.net). The Foundation has helped the District maintain lower class sizes and ensure valuable programs are provided to our students. Sincerely, |
||
|
Catherine J. Nichols, Ed.D. Superintendent |
||
SOS Campaign Kicks Off
Dear Families of the Glendora Unified School District:
Thanks to you, we are doing great things! Last year, with your support, we were able to raise $365,000 to help our schools through the Support Our Students (SOS) Campaign. With these funds, we made direct and significant contributions at every school in the district:
• Continued instrumental and voice instruction in the 4th grade.
• Restored ½ teaching position to maintain class size at elementary level.
• Restored 1 teacher position shared at the middle schools for electives and college preparatory classes.
• Restored 1 Math and 1 English teacher at Glendora High School to maintain class size.
• Restored the on-site school resource officer who services all schools.
Your commitment and generosity made it possible to provide a better education for our students.
It’s no secret the State’s economic challenges are still affecting Glendora’s schools and our students. The GUSD budget has been drastically cut, and next year’s budget will again be reduced an additional $4.5 million. However, we, as a community, can do something about it. Through your donations to the SOS campaign, we are empowered to make a positive impact on our children’s education and maintain the educational excellence for which Glendora is known.
Our goal this year is to surpass our 2009 fundraising level. Please give to the SOS campaign, which kicks off in February. We invite you to explore our website, www.fgus.net, for information on what we’re doing, what’s happening in education at the state level, a message from our district, and how you can become involved to make a difference.
Your support of education here in Glendora is very important. With your tax-deductible donation, you show our students their education is a priority in this community. Please make your donation today and display your SOS yard sign in May to show your support of Glendora’s students.
You can make your tax-deductible donation by:
• Completing the enclosed envelope and sending it via mail or to your child’s school.
• Using PayPal on fgus.net.
• Becoming a member of Circle of Giving, a convenient monthly deduction plan available on fgus.net.
Together, we will continue to do great things!
Sincerely,
Mike Beckman
President, Foundation for Glendora Unified Schools
Superintendent’s Corner: Fulfilling Our Promises
By Catherine Nichols
Superintendent of Glendora Unified School District
There is a sacred trust, a covenant, which local school districts maintain with parents, community members, and business people. Glendora Unified embraces that trust and has fulfilled our part of the covenant.
Glendora Unified School District is committed to preparing our students to meet the future with confidence.
The goal of education is to tap into the talents of each student and create an environment where they flourish, individually and collectively. Student academic success is part of the covenant we embrace.
During the last 5 years, the District increased its API test score 65 points; rising steadily from 786 to 851. All Schools in the District have an API over 800 and several have scored over 900.
The path to the future appears bright as we connect our students to their passions, providing multidimensional learning that is personalized.
Student success in academics, the arts, music and athletics are the focus of Glendora Unified. Glendora High School was among the top 5 percent of high schools in the nation named by Newsweek Magazine in both 2008 and 2009.
Success builds upon success and the positive results of hard work by teachers, administrators and support staff is apparent.
Of the nine comprehensive schools in Glendora Unified, six schools have become California Distinguished Schools and one school has been named a Title I Achieving School over the past five years.
California Business for Education Excellence and Just for the Kids named five schools in Glendora Unified for outstanding success in raising student academic achievement!
The Foundation for Glendora Unified Schools has donated more than $700,000 to the district over the past two years.
Glendora Unified School District has worked to preserve and nurture the dreams and aspirations of our students.
Until now, although battered by devastating cuts to education, Glendora Unified has persevered with a focus on our priorities: increased student achievement, closing the achievement gap and creating a 4-year college culture.
But California schools are at risk. There is only a very thin veneer that is keeping GUSD - and most school districts in the state - on track.
Each student, whether they are in the first grade or eleventh grade, has only one year to learn that particular curriculum, and we cannot let them down.
Through this devastating fiscal crisis, the worst since the Great Depression, we have feverishly sought to maintain programs, services and support to our students.
School districts statewide have cut funds for textbooks, reduced personnel, depleted reserves and closed schools.
Now the Governor has proposed additional cuts to education. My district of 7,000 students has 10 million dollars less this year, a 20 percent reduction in funds, to educate our students.
We have pulled the “infrastructure” of our school district apart to keep cuts as far away as possible from our precious students.
We have fulfilled our part of this covenant. We have tenaciously maintained high expectations for our students to close the achievement gap, increase student achievement and create a 4-year college culture, but we are on the precipice.
Education must once again become a priority for our state, not in lip service, but in resources. It is a shame and shameful that students in California receive less money per child than students in Mississippi or Alabama or Tennessee.
Do we want our students to have the same opportunities as students in New York or New Jersey? Will our students need to compete with these students? You bet they will. We must have the will and courage to regain the stature that California once enjoyed and more importantly provide necessary resources to our children.
A well-educated work force is critical to the economic success of our state and nation.
The degree of interdependence that exists because of the global economy, the technology that links people throughout the world and the outsourcing that is occurring to India and China should serve as a wake up call.
In order to maintain a competitive advantage, to maintain a high quality of life, we must reinvest in our schools.
Boldly and unequivocally I assert we, in Glendora Unified and in school districts throughout the state, have fulfilled our part of this sacred covenant.
The state has not done the same. We are feverishly trying to protect our students. We, the adults in this state, are responsible for, and contributors to, the continued neglect of the schools.
We also have the power, if we have the will and resolve, to demand school funding be restored to levels that students in California experienced when the state was truly golden and not tarnished.
Source: San Gabriel Valley Tribune
Save the Date: April 30, 2010
Mark your calendars and save the date! Join the Foundation for Glendora Unified Schools as we host our annual charity dinner event Food for Thought Friday, April 30, 2010.
A community fundraiser benefiting Glendora Unified School District students, this promises to be a fun and rewarding evening.
The Foundation Raises $365,000 for GUSD
The Foundation for Glendora Unified Schools (FGUS) is working in cooperation with the district to address the current crisis in state educational funding. Last year, thanks to donations from the Glendora community, FGUS was able to raise $365,000 to help support the students of Glendora Unified in the current school year. The funds were used for programs, reinstating teacher positions, maintaining student/teacher ratios, and restoring the Security Resource Officer at all schools. FGUS is in the process of planning its 2009-2010 fundraising activities in order to assist the district in maintaining educational excellence.

Pictured (left to right): School board President Mike Gautreau, board member Dr. Chuck Gomer, board Vice President Denice Delgado, Foundation President Mike Beckman, Foundation Vice President Laura Launchbaugh, Foundation member Phil Currie, board member Doris Blum, board clerk Doug Ferrell and Superintendent Dr. Catherine Nichols.
GUSD Superintendent Summer ‘09 Letter
|
||
|
June 12, 2009 |
BOARD OF EDUCATION Mike Gautreau, President Denice K. Delgado, Vice President Douglas R. Ferrell, P.E, Clerk Doris Blum, Member Charles J. Gomer, Ph.D., Member Catherine J. Nichols, Ed.D. Superintendent |
|
|
Dear Parents and Community Members, Glendora Unified School District (GUSD), as all other school districts in the state, has experienced staggering cuts to its budget this year by the State of California. As a result, the decisions our district must make are extremely difficult. Fiscal chaos is reigning in the state of California and the Governor has recently proposed in his May Budget Revision additional massive cuts for education effective for both 2008-09 (the current school year) and 2009-10. These new cuts have put GUSD in an extremely precarious position. For GUSD, these proposed cuts for education result in an immediate loss of $4 million. Please note these cuts are in addition to the $6.1 million in cuts GUSD made just 3 months ago. During this fiscal crisis, we have remained committed to preserving the educational integrity of our schools and programs. Thus far GUSD has taken the following actions to remain fiscally solvent:
Unfortunately, all those cuts and reductions are not enough. We must now move to the next level of cuts and reductions. What does this mean? GUSD must make nearly $2.4 million in additional cuts by June 30. Approximately 80% of the budget is personnel; therefore, we must make additional cuts to personnel. We are proposing the following as options to help mitigate the budget deficit; some items require negotiations with our unions:
The Board of Education made a very courageous and difficult decision. They voted to create a District Advisory Committee, “7-11″ committee that will make a recommendation to the Board on closing an elementary school at the end of June. The committee will be charged with analyzing all 6 elementary schools, using a specific set of criteria, and then making a recommendation to the Board of Education. Invitations to individuals to serve on the committee will be issued over the next few days. The dates, time and location of the District Advisory Committee (DAC) meetings will be posted on our website. They are open meetings, operating under the Brown Act; therefore, anyone may attend them. It will be a transparent and open process. It is anticipated the DAC will make its recommendation to the Board at a special meeting, likely to be held at the end of June or early July. Parents and employees of the selected school will be notified of the closure as soon as the Board makes its decision. This was a very difficult decision for our Board to act on, but it is in the best interests of the school district to close a school as soon as possible. An elementary school closure provides approximately $500,000 in savings annually. The elementary school will be closed before school begins in the fall. The District plans to survey our Glendora community to determine if it will support a local parcel tax. Voters over 65 years of age may be excluded from paying the parcel tax. Currently, 90% of the school district’s funds come from the State and we are powerless within this budget system. We believe the residents of Glendora support local control for the school district and would be willing to provide approximately $16 a month for 4 years to help the school district maintain the excellent education it currently provides to students while the state is in chaos. The money would be used to maintain and restore educational programs, teachers, counselors and services to our students. An oversight committee would be established to ensure the money is spent as specified in the ballot. I believe our children deserve better than 49th out of 50th in funding in the United States. I urge you to contact your legislators and share your views on the state fiscal crisis and how these cuts are devastating the local school district. Please consider donating to the Foundation for Glendora Schools (FGUS.net). All donated money directly supports our schools. Respectfully, |
||
|
Catherine J. Nichols Ed.D. Superintendent |
||
California public schools seek private money just to cover the basics
By Seema Mehta
Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
Foundations are nothing new, but they’re multiplying as huge budgets cuts loom. And beyond enrichment, their goals now are saving teacher positions and keeping class sizes down.
![]() |
|
Gina Ferazzi / Los Angeles Times
High school students wash cars at Peninsula High School to raise money for the Peninsula Education Foundation’s Save Our Teachers Now campaign in Rolling Hills Estates Saturday, April 19, 2008.
|
South Orange County families are being urged to donate $400 per student to save the jobs of 266 teachers in the Capistrano Unified School District.
Parents at Long Beach’s Longfellow Elementary are among countless statewide who are launching fundraising foundations.
Bay Area parents launched a campaign featuring children standing in trash cans; the theme is “Public Education Is Too Valuable to Waste.”
A free public school education is guaranteed by the state Constitution to every California child. But as districts grapple with proposed state funding cuts that could cause the layoffs of thousands of teachers and inflate class sizes, parents are being asked to dig deeper into their pocketbooks to help.
“Public education is free, but an excellent public education is not free at this point,” said Janet Berry, president of the Davis Schools Foundation, which recently launched the Dollar-a-Day campaign, urging citizens of the city near Sacramento to donate $365 per child, grandchild or student acquaintance.
But “we never really imagined the magnitude of the problem, the budget cuts, would be this great.”
Educators must finalize their budgets for the next school year before Sacramento votes on the state’s spending plan. Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s proposed budget would cut about $4.8 billion in education funding this year and next. As a result, potential layoff notices have been issued to 20,000 teachers, librarians, nurses and others.
In addition to increasing class sizes, school districts across the state are considering closing schools, eliminating International Baccalaureate and Advanced Placement courses and doing away with sports.
School districts have long trotted out worst-case scenarios in an effort to sway lawmakers before they vote on the budget; this year, however, educators and politicians say lean times are ahead.
Public school district fundraising foundations were first formed after voter approval in 1978 of Proposition 13, which limited property tax increases and dramatically reduced school finances. Those groups have long helped parents in affluent areas enrich their children’s public school educations in ways that include field trips, music classes and such expensive classroom equipment as digital cameras, scientific robots and laptops. Today, such groups are fighting to pay for the basics: teachers’ jobs, manageable class sizes, nurses.
“It’s gone beyond frills at this point,” said David Wagman, president of the Peninsula Education Foundation, which is asking Palos Verdes parents for $200 per child to save the jobs of 59 teachers. PTAs and students are also holding fundraisers.
Education officials acknowledge that these fundraising groups are more successful in wealthier areas, increasing the divide between the haves and the have-nots. And they can make financially strapped parents in affluent districts feel like second-class citizens.
Achievement gap
“Parents in well-to-do communities can raise significant sums of money to augment their local schools’ budgets, while schools in low-income neighborhoods fall further behind,” said state Supt. of Public Instruction Jack O’Connell. “This is part of the reason that we have an achievement gap in California. We have an economic and moral imperative to close this gap.”
In the Anaheim City School District, four of every five students qualify for free or reduced-price lunches, a poverty indicator. A district volunteer-led foundation raises about $50,000 annually through employee contributions and fundraisers to send all sixth-graders to overnight science camp in the San Bernardino Mountains.
The Anaheim parents are never asked to do more than volunteer for small fundraisers, such as bake sales or selling gift wrap or entertainment books.
“It’s not even a consideration to be able to ask them for money,” said district spokeswoman Suzi Brown. “When we look at what other districts are doing, they’ve got foundations that have paid staff. We don’t compete with that at all. We are in a completely different league.”
David Long, California’s education secretary, acknowledged the inequity but said money from nonprofit organizations and federal funds earmarked for poorer schools help level the playing field somewhat. However, he said the only way to fix the state’s finances is for the Legislature to approve Schwarzenegger’s budget stabilization act, which would put away surplus revenue during economic booms for use in leaner times.
“We do not want to continue to have these conversations” about cuts, he said. “It’s hurtful for the children of California.”
Meanwhile, more than 600 foundations across the state are raising money for public schools and districts, said Susan Sweeney, executive director of the California Consortium of Education Foundations. In recent months, she has seen an increase in the number of calls from parents interested in starting such groups.
Longfellow Elementary parents in Long Beach are among them. After learning of the potential state budget cuts, combined with the loss of some federal funding, parents decided to create the Longfellow Legacy Foundation.
Jim Zellerbach, a co-founder with two children at the school, said the group hopes to boost campus coffers by the 2009-10 school year, too late to stop anticipated cuts to the school nurse, librarian and other programs expected in the coming school year.
Longtime foundations are also stepping up their efforts. The Irvine Public Schools Foundation, which raises $3 million annually and has raffled off a house each year since 2004, is convinced that state cuts are only going to slice closer to the bone in coming years. To prepare, the group is launching a university-like fundraising effort this fall, complete with an endowment.
“The only way to take good districts and make them great is to do private fundraising. But it’s even more urgent now with the terrible budget cuts,” said Jerry Mandel, the foundation’s chief operating officer.
Even in rosier financial times, parents are bombarded with requests for money for proms and yearbooks, field trips and gym clothes. And they get fed up.
Jill Case, whose son is a senior at Aliso Niguel High School in Aliso Viejo, said she spends $100 to $200 at the start of each school year and writes frequent additional checks throughout the year. Case, who runs a nonprofit organization that helps disabled children and senior citizens, said she does not think she can afford to write a $400 check to the foundation of the school district, Capistrano Unified.
“There’s an assumption that everyone here is rich and what’s the big deal,” said Case, of Laguna Niguel. “But there are families that are struggling. That’s what bothers me the most. The truth is, I’ve been struggling too. You always come up with something for your kids. You don’t want them to feel left out. . . . That’s not the way it’s supposed to be in public schools.”
Those concerns are driving the second goal of foundations across the state: raising public awareness of how schools are funded in California. The state ranks 46th in the nation in per-pupil spending.
Schools in the Alameda Unified School District have reduced their budgets by $7.7 million in seven years. So when community members learned that the governor’s proposed budget would mean an additional $4.5 million in cuts next year, they placed a parcel tax for schools on the June ballot, their second in four years.
The proposal, which would expire in four years if approved, would create a $120 annual levy on residential properties and would charge businesses $120 to $9,500, depending on size.
Trash can campaign
To raise awareness, a parent who runs an ad agency created the “Step Up” campaign.
Students, teachers and coaches have perched inside trash cans around Alameda, with signs reading “Our students / teachers / coaches are too valuable to throw away.” Similar mottoes were placed on city garbage trucks, trash bins and T-shirts.
When Schwarzenegger attended a conference Wednesday at the Hornet, an aircraft carrier now docked in Alameda as a museum, 200 parents, students and teachers protested.
“There’s nothing like showing up when the governor’s there and sticking real kids and real teachers in trash cans,” said Brooke Briggance of the Alameda Education Foundation, “and saying, ‘You know what? This is what you’re doing.’ “
seema.mehta “at” latimes.com
The Mystery of California Public School Funding
By Dr. William V. Loose, Deputy Superintendent
La Canada Unified School District
It is commonly asked “why” something that should be so simple as public school funding becomes so complex. This article will briefly attempt to explain the basic public school funding mechanism and the process that ensues that tends to complicate the issues.
Prior to 1972 and Prop 13, school districts were largely dependent upon property taxes which furnished about 2/3 of public education revenues. Because of so much of the revenue being generated by the property tax, and having more local ability to raise this amount, there was “more local control” regarding the amount and extent of revenues. However, this type system also resulted in a great disparity among resources for school districts, and led to the Serrano vs Priest lawsuit which challenged the fairness of the funding inequities resulting from widely disparate property values and tax bases.
The passage of Proposition 13, in conjunction with the Serrano decision, caused a shift in support for schools from local property taxes to state general funds. Local voters can levy a uniform dollar tax per parcel of land, but they cannot increase property taxes based on value except for issuing a general obligation (G.O.) bonds for school construction or renovation. This shifted the locus of control from local school funding, to the state for California public schools.
California has approximately 1000 public school districts. Almost all public school districts receive their school funding through a “revenue limit.” The revenue limit is the amount of revenue a district can collect annually for general purposes. The funds that comprise the revenue limit are local property taxes and state aid. The revenue limit is composed of a base amount for each unit of average day attendance (ADA). The basic formula is: Revenue Limit amount, multiplied by ADA = a district’s apportionment/funding.
The State does not give the same revenue limit amount to all public schools. This is a long complicated story involving litigation (Serrrano v. Priest), and attempts through the years by the State to try to “equalize” the funding of the revenue limit between school districts. Despite these measures, the revenue limit amount that each district has is still unique to that district, and is still not equal among districts. Some of the difference is the result of Categorical Spending, which are funds designated to be spent on specific programs tied to District demographics, be they socioeconomic or otherwise.
In most years, the State tries to provide a cost of living adjustment (COLA) for school districts. This COLA is meant to help cover increasing operational costs (utilities, materials, insurance benefit and statutory benefit increases, “step and column” salary increases – ie, increases tied to increased years of service and additional training - among others). Districts also negotiate with their own unions (classified and certificated) for a general salary increase using the new money provided by the COLA.
Unfortunately, in many years, the State has insufficient funds to fully provide all the school districts with the full amount of the COLA to increase each district’s revenue limit. When this occurs, the State applies a “deficit factor.” This deficit factor is a partial deduction from the funding due to the school districts. In some years, the deficit factor has been as high as 3-4%. When multiplied by millions of dollars, this becomes a considerable amount of money that is not provided to school districts.
Another factor is declining enrollment. Approximately half the districts in California, including La Canada, are experiencing declining enrollment. Referring back to the basic funding formula presented above, if a district’s ADA number decreases each year, the amount of funds the district will be receiving also will decrease.
Part of the mystery regarding the funding for public school becomes what the true amount of new money received in a district as a result of the COLA adjustment. One would assume that if the COLA was 5.18% (original COLA estimate for 2006-07), that you could take last year’s state revenue, multiply that by 5.18% COLA increase, and you would have the total amount of new revenue. As you have surmised, this is not the case.
The reason why the actual amount received by LCUSD is less that this percentage is due to the deficit factor, declining enrollment, and other adjustments made to the revenue limit. So although at first glance based on a COLA percentage estimated increase of 5.18% you would expect LCUSD revenue would also increase by 5.18%, the actual true increase will be a smaller percentage increase of revenue.
In May, the Governor will present his “May Revise.” This presentation lays out the Governor’s proposed State Budget including proposed funding for public schools. The State Legislature is supposed to adopt the State Budget by June 15, and the Governor is supposed to sign the State Budget by June 30. In the most recent history, the State budget adoption process has continued beyond these dates into the summer. Once the State budget is adopted and signed, all districts, including LCUSD will know with certainty what the 2006-07 COLA, deficit factor (if any), and what other funding will be available for the public schools. However, despite this scenario and timeline, school districts must adopt our budgets prior to June 30. In many years, this is done before the State budget is finalized. A public hearing will be held at one of our school board meetings regarding the LCUSD budget so if you are interested in attending this meeting, please check the LCUSD Board meeting agendas for June.
Thank you for your kind attention to this article and that it hopefully has helped provide you with a baseline of information regarding public school funding.

